This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 and profit/non-profit IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Fri Oct 28 14:08:49 CEST 2011
On 28 Oct 2011, at 13:04, Andy Davidson wrote: > This might be hard for IPRAs IMO. How about an IXP which has a commercial (non-association) constitution but no intention to profit from members ? How about an IXP which is a free product of a commercial company, that will charge no fees ? How about an IXP with an non-profit constitution, and association, that does in fact make a large constitution and possibly is permitted to redistribute it ? Sorry, the third example is supposed to be ... "How about an IXP with an non-profit constitution, and association, that does in fact make a large surplus and possibly is permitted to redistribute it ?"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 and profit/non-profit IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]