[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)

Hallo,

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Michael Adams <madams at netcologne.de> wrote:
> Am 24.10.2011 11:59, schrieb Dan Luedtke:
>> Isn't it better to change that procedure to not require unnecessary work?
> For us this would be sufficient. Something like "If you qualify for an initial
> /29 you may extend your /32 directly to a /29 an skip the HD-ratio rule." would
> perfectly match for us.


I am not a RIPE member (just a regular customer of a LIR), so I don't
know if I can propose a policy change, but I am sure you can.

-- snip --
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria

Subsequent allocation will be provided when an organisation (i.e. ISP/LIR):
 a) satisfies the evaluation threshold of past address utilisation in
terms of the number of sites in units of /56 assignments. The HD-Ratio
[RFC 3194] is used to determine the utilisation thresholds that
justify the allocation of additional address as described below;

b) qualifies in accordance with the criteria for an initial allocation of /29.
-- snap --

Something like this?


regards.
 danrl

--
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de