This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Fri Nov 18 22:28:15 CET 2011
On 11/18/2011 06:41 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: >> I'd like to suggest that the default allocation should continue to be >> /32, >> but if the LIR makes a claim that they are going to implement 6rd (or >> another equivalent transition technology which requires lots of address >> space), then they can receive up to a /29. > This is also Remco's suggestion, /32 as default, up to /29 only if LIR > asks I support this. There's no reason to allocate more than /32 for LIR by default. In special cases, there's no reason to block that allocation, but someone has provide some arguments to support his requirement....
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]