This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Fri Nov 18 18:41:57 CET 2011
On 11/18/11 3:04 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > I'd like to suggest that the default allocation should continue to be /32, > but if the LIR makes a claim that they are going to implement 6rd (or > another equivalent transition technology which requires lots of address > space), then they can receive up to a /29. Well done :) This is also Remco's suggestion, /32 as default, up to /29 only if LIR asks - and this is going to new version of 2011-04, that will be posted to your favorite mailinglist shortly :) Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]