This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Nov 15 11:25:11 CET 2011
On 11/15/11 10:49 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:59:35AM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: >> Broadcom revealed that in new chipset for CPE IPv6 and 6RD are HW >> accelerated. Major vendors are offering 6RD core boxes and many operators >> are testing them. Let's do that properly, if it's unavoidable. 6RD is not >> the best mechanism ever invented, but making it more complicated and >> expensive with multiple-6rd-domains because of lack of IPv6 space makes >> operational life even more complicated. > > "properly" as in "easy to deploy" would be to have an extra, eventually > temporary, separate /24 for 6RD. Maybe yes (as this was also my idea initially), but we already went through this discussion and message from community was clear. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]