This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Tue Nov 15 10:49:09 CET 2011
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:59:35AM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > Broadcom revealed that in new chipset for CPE IPv6 and 6RD are HW > accelerated. Major vendors are offering 6RD core boxes and many operators > are testing them. Let's do that properly, if it's unavoidable. 6RD is not > the best mechanism ever invented, but making it more complicated and > expensive with multiple-6rd-domains because of lack of IPv6 space makes > operational life even more complicated. "properly" as in "easy to deploy" would be to have an extra, eventually temporary, separate /24 for 6RD. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]