[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"

Hello James,

Speeking about concensus is definitely wrong.

I'll send a longer critical aanlyses later,

Best,

Géza



On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:13 AM, James Blessing <
james.blessing at despres.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It seems that the consensus is that up to a /29 is the right amount of
> space for the majority of networks, if that is the case I've  think we
> should add the following:
>
> ==
>
> 5.1.x
>
> Organisations that have already received their initial allocations are
> able to request additional address space up to a /29 without supplying
> of further documentation as if they were a first time requestor.
>
> ==
>
> The logic being that this solves the problem for networks who deployed
> before this change and avoids the issues with HD ratio (which I think
> needs some looking at, but not here)
>
> J
>
> --
>
> James Blessing
> 07989 039 476
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111114/f318865e/attachment.html>