This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): FW: [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: address-policy-wg digest, Vol 1 #1326 - 4 msgs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
thabet at gmail.com
thabet at gmail.com
Fri May 13 10:47:20 CEST 2011
I agree with Vladislav Potapov Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from du -----Original Message----- From: <poty at iiat.ru> Sender: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:44:42 To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Subject: FW: [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 Hello, I do not support this proposal. We are speaking about real possibilities and real impact. The proposers doesn't know exactly the impact of the changes and are deaf to the other people pointing to the real troubles relating the grooving number of prefixes. Their naïve assumptions about cheap BGP routers show their inability to broader the mind just outside their small nets needs. Technical requirements should be the only way of making decisions. If someone has tendency to lie - it would lie anyway - one thing or another. Regards, Vladislav Potapov Ru.iiat
- Previous message (by thread): FW: [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: address-policy-wg digest, Vol 1 #1326 - 4 msgs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]