This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
FW: [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 Most recent version of the CPS?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
poty at iiat.ru
poty at iiat.ru
Fri May 13 10:44:42 CEST 2011
Hello, I do not support this proposal. We are speaking about real possibilities and real impact. The proposers doesn't know exactly the impact of the changes and are deaf to the other people pointing to the real troubles relating the grooving number of prefixes. Their naïve assumptions about cheap BGP routers show their inability to broader the mind just outside their small nets needs. Technical requirements should be the only way of making decisions. If someone has tendency to lie - it would lie anyway - one thing or another. Regards, Vladislav Potapov Ru.iiat
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 Most recent version of the CPS?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]