[address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/05/2011 11:15, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I think the next stage will be to get relevant legal advice and have
>> it published on the list.
> 
> i thought sander and gert did that and we now seem to be in the stage of
> second-guessing it.

Nothing I said disagreed with the legal advice given. I did disagree
with the inferences the RIPE NCC apparently drew from it (which Sander
appended to the legal advice). That's quite different.

Any good lawyer will do as the NCC's one did and limit their advice to
what is current and known, and the question asked. He can't be blamed if
his advice is represented as meaning something more than he said.

Malcolm.
- -- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
  Maya House, 134-138 Borough High Street, London SE1 1LB

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3HxrIACgkQJiK3ugcyKhTrNACfUJXoOt8iY9p4DozX108bgLpQ
kSEAoJoMzuBFNiJu0DWfWPxNJPlM8xjR
=nMn1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----