This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon May 9 12:39:46 CEST 2011
On 9 May 2011, at 11:15, Randy Bush wrote: >> I think the next stage will be to get relevant legal advice and have >> it published on the list. > > i thought sander and gert did that and we now seem to be in the > stage of > second-guessing it. Please point me/us at the email containing the brief given to the lawyer and the one containing their reply. Sander and Gert will of course have done a competent and responsible job here, as will the lawyer. But that has to be seen to have been done.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]