[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR

On 05/03/2011 01:45 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
> I surely hope not, then the current policy is defective. Last I heard,
> RIPE made reservation for growth when handing out first /32, so next
> it'll be /31, /30 etc, up to the reserved /29.
> 

But, PI has minimum at /48. In /32, there're 65536 /48 blocks. And costs
of LIR doesn't increase so much, if he moves from /32 to /31, 30... (and
similary in IPv4). Thats' the point... And probably nobody will support
change in current billing policy of RIPE NCC towards higher cost of
larger PA assignments (=increase it's own costs).

Daniel