[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR

Hello, Mikael.
> That's why I want (v4|v6) PI to cost 2000EUR, not 50EUR.
Please understand, that it will never happen. People, who are using
now PI IPv4 space will never pay extra 2K Euro for IPv6 addresses.
It's a historical issue of PI addresses, it's impossible describe to
these users the difference between PI v 4 and PI v 6. They will rather
use NAT IPv4 or PA IPv6, as Marcin Kuczera described. Also I fully
agree with Daniel Suchy.

We have now around 350 customers with PI IPv4 blocks and our customers
decided to NOT implement IPv6 till IPv6 PI policy will not change.
Just imagine - we have now around 350 PI IPv4 blocks and 10 PI IPv6,
it doesn't look like a "IPv6 act now " !
So, during last year no one user of PI IPv4 became a LIR. They simply
ignore it.
So if we will not change the IPv6 policy, these customers will not
implement IPv6 in their networks, or will implement it with using of
PA IPv6 addresses of LIR, but routing table will still growth.


best regards,
Alexander Vishnyakov,
Tel.: (+420) 257 218 437  |  (+420) 603 109 280
Fax: (+420) 257 218 437
ICQ: 164 695 837
Skype: isp-servis-cz
Vissado s.r.o.  |  Hevlínská 435/8, 155 21 Praha 5
www.isp-servis.cz



On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011, Marcin Kuczera wrote:
>
>> And you know what, I suppose that this already happens and RIPE can't stop
>> it. If new policy will try to block it, people will find our legal
>> workaround. People are smarter than any institution.
>
> That's why I want (v4|v6) PI to cost 2000EUR, not 50EUR.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
>
>