[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR

Marcin Kuczera wrote: 
> Seriously, is there ANY resonable reason why policy for IPv6 PI can not be
> same as for IPv4 PI ?

Because the IPv4 PI policy is an unfortunate relic that has seen much uhm, creative use that required a policy such as 2007-01 to clean up and has so far taken dozens of man years to implement?

If you don't want to or can't pay for resources you use, you should be asking yourself questions. If you're not running a sustainable business, you're exercising a hobby. Why would somebody else pay for your hobby?

As far as I've seen, the cost of utility power and network hardware in what you describe as 'post communistic block' is not that different from what you describe as 'old Europe', so I'm intrigued how those (I think far more significant) costs affect you.

Remco
No hats.


This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited.  Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW.  Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.