This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Sun May 1 23:54:07 CEST 2011
Martin Millnert wrote: > Marcin, > > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Marcin Kuczera <marcin at leon.pl> wrote: >>> To which I wonder, how painful is 50 EUR/year per business >>> ("additional fees may apply"), to bring its own prefix to someone >>> else's hosting/network infrastructure? >> ok, we still do not understand each other. > > Yes, sorry, I forgot you were talking about ISPs. > > Though, 50 EUR/year for PIv6 for each one of the ISPs customer is > merely 4 EUR/month per customer. And they get their own /48 PIv6 > prefix! ;) ha ha ha.... Seriously, is there ANY resonable reason why policy for IPv6 PI can not be same as for IPv4 PI ? Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]