This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Mar 30 17:02:31 CEST 2011
Hi Leo, >> They do have to provide IPv6 services to other organizations though: >> "... have a plan for making sub-allocations to other organisations and/or End Site assignments within two years." > > A plan isn a plan and not a commitment, though. > > No-one's going to take the LIR's space away if they miss the target. On that basis, we know that this requirements is purely a form of words and has no real value. I don't agree with you here. If you run a grocery store (or other non ISP business) it might be hard to show believable plan for making sub-allocations or assignments... And there is no target anymore, so there is nothing to miss ;-) - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]