This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
joao at bondis.org
Wed Mar 30 13:50:00 CEST 2011
On 30 Mar 2011, at 13:02, Jan Tuomi wrote: > Hi Erik, > > Why remove the multi-homing requirement? if you are not multihomed you could go with the PA-space you get from your single upstream provider? I guess it is because, as IPv6 moves from using Powerpoint as its main transport to using Ethernet, people are finding out that renumbering is just as hard in IPv4 as it is in IPv6, so people want to be *Provider Independent* Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]