[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI request is turned down for my multihomed hosting facility - Why?

W dniu 2011-03-30 10:58, Tero Toikkanen pisze:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I’m concerned, there seems to be a strange discrepancy between
> IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI. Apparently Janne has already successfully obtained
> IPv4 PI and has now requested IPv6 PI, declaring the same intended use.
> Could someone please point out where in the policy documents it says one
> can use IPv4 PI for hosting, but not IPv6 PI? I’m having a hard time
> finding such terms.
>
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-512#_8._IPv6_Provider

Most important is the last sentence:
The PI assignment cannot be further assigned to other organisations.

And according to IPRA, if you provide hosting services on your own 
infratructure to other companies, you are sub-allocating part of your PI 
address space to them, so you cannot use PI address space for that purpose.

Regards
-- 
Adrian