This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Jun 2 00:11:10 CEST 2011
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:49:04AM -1000, David Conrad wrote: >- allow for SIDR deployment >- allow for the RIRs to enforce their policies >- allow for the RIRs to have a viable business model after IPv4 is exhausted >- allow the existing address hierarchy model to be enforced (disallow 'alternative address registries') Well, probably time someone actually said it. It makes more sense than some global government conspiracy, however: the fact that NCC had a happy-clappy "very cordial" meeting with SOCA (yes, the Internet is Serious and Organised Crime in the UK) makes me wonder. rgds, s.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Legal counsel on 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]