This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Jul 28 11:09:38 CEST 2011
On 28 Jul 2011, at 08:46, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 01:15:01AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: >> It should be patently clear RIPE cannot take a decision about address >> certification any time soon, if ever. > > The outcome of the PDP is that there is no consensus to implement > address certification. To me, that's a decision of the RIPE community, > against address certification. Indeed. Meanwhile, the NCC's Activity Plan which was approved at the May AGM authorises the NCC to continue its work on address certification. Something needs to be done about that. Which is why Nigel suggested a vote at the AGM next year. We need a clear decision which can be understood by everyone. As I explained earlier, the implications for the current situation go beyond our service region and community.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]