This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 10:39:33 CEST 2011
On 28 July 2011 08:56, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Now some parts of the community seem to say "don't go there" (simplified). Er, I agree that its a simplification, but I think the major concern was not that the signing of resources was made technically possible, but that there wasn't a distributed model of authority implemented so that 'attacks' (physical or political) on the infrastructure could not remove control of routing from the network operators. The work on signing has been wasted, what is needed now is some method to take that work and build something that can be trusted by all side of the community. J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]