[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)

Hello Florian,


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> wrote:

> * Turchanyi Geza:
>
> > The potential cost of applying more staff at the RIRs like RIPE NCC is
> just
> > one issue. The more important issue is that  all the line cards of the
> core
> > routers should be replaced if we can not limit the grows of the
> forwarding
> > tables (FIB)s. AND IPv4 address space trading allready might create
> problems
> > concerning the grows.
>
> The RIPE NCC is not an Internet service provider, so this aspect is not
> relevant to RIPE NCC operations, and it does not justify interference
> from the board.
>
> When I started to work for the Internet development in 1991 it was a slogan
what caught me:

Think globally, act locally!

Whatever hat I would wear I would like to see a little bit longer and wider
than the hat would suggest.

Best,
        Géza
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110712/82cdc737/attachment.html>