This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Jul 11 12:33:06 CEST 2011
On 11/07/2011 08:53, Florian Weimer wrote: > The RIPE NCC is not an Internet service provider, so this aspect is not > relevant to RIPE NCC operations, and it does not justify interference > from the board. The board neither made this point, nor did they interfere. They expressed some personal disquiet about the proposal which in this case was leaked out through the RIPE NCC impact analysis (it normally doesn't get leaked and I'll make sure it doesn't again if this is the sort of trouble it causes) Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]