[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)

Hí Sascha,




On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Sascha Lenz <slz at baycix.de> wrote:

>
> you still haven't provided any reasons why there should be a sudden spike
> and evidence suggesting that there will be.
> Why are you insisting on this? What is your secret agenda? Do you have any
> information you're not sharing?
>


I think you should look into tho other end of the binoculars.

If you propose something, you shold be able to think about the consequences.
What might happen in two months, in one year, in 3 years and in ten years.

This is your duty!

The problem is that some people think that they can make policy proposals
without thinking the technical and financial consequences.

I you can prove that increasing the size of the routing table would not
cause neither slow down nor extra cost then I will carefully listen to your
arguments, as you definitely might invented something fundamentally new.

However, have you read the paper mentionned by Randy Bush?

Best,

Géza
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110709/a02bbda3/attachment.html>