This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Fri Jul 1 16:38:36 CEST 2011
Hello, On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>wrote: We're not going to run out, there is no such thing. There is only pain level > to rise, it's not going to stop working. I'm sure there are vendors who'd > happily sell you devices in a few years that'll do 10M routes in FIB if they > thought there was market demand. > > > Then ALL the routers in the backbone MUST be changed... is this a real alternative? Just for a bad decision? What about speed of convergence of there will be so many routes? Handling the limits of routes allowed today in first class backbone needs already long time, is n't it? Thanks, Géza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110701/6921ba28/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]