This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Fri Jul 1 12:14:35 CEST 2011
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > However, I still think that the concept of implementing IPv6 PI address > space never reached a full concensensus. Not even a rough one. Even though I oppose easy IPv6 PI, I'd still say I was in enough majority to warrant claim of at least rough consensus. > We might run out of the routing tables before that IPv4 -> IPv6 transition > goes above 80% -- this is a real danger! We're not going to run out, there is no such thing. There is only pain level to rise, it's not going to stop working. I'm sure there are vendors who'd happily sell you devices in a few years that'll do 10M routes in FIB if they thought there was market demand. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Board position on 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]