This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elmar K. Bins
elmi at 4ever.de
Tue Feb 15 10:16:08 CET 2011
lutz at iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote: > * Yasen Simeonov(Neterra NMT) wrote: > > Why every other company can have PI, but ISPs can't? > > Because ISPs should use PA (as LIR). It's their job to hand out addresses to > their customers. Lutz, nothing against terse answers, especially towards people who are not really explaining and/or addressing the problems at hand, but: ISPs can certainly receive PI space if they can justify the need. Usually ISPs get PI space for a specific customer, working as a handling agent, but in certain special cases, PI space gets issued to ISPs directly. The point in this discussion is that Yasen either does not or does not want to understand the actual issue... Elmar. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110215/345136a1/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]