This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michiel Klaver
michiel at klaver.it
Tue Feb 15 10:48:25 CET 2011
At 15-02-2011 09:52, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > * Yasen Simeonov(Neterra NMT) wrote: >> Why every other company can have PI, but ISPs can't? > > Because ISPs should use PA (as LIR). It's their job to hand out addresses to > their customers. > Isn't this supposed to be a market of current LIRs to act as a local registry agent and hand out (renting) smaller blocks (/48 for example) of their own PA space to anyone who is willing to use and route it? A LIR does not have to be an ISP, and vice-versa. It just happens most companies are both for the ease of administration. A LIR is nothing more than an administration office and has to act according to RIPE policies when assigning address space to their customers and keep the RIPE whois database up-to-date. As small ISP you can contact any LIR for registry services and receive parts of their PA space if they agree. https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]