This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Feb 14 23:26:29 CET 2011
Hi Mark, > Another option (but that isn't something for > this list I guess) is to have some LIR extra light account with just 1 IPv6 > range and for more you need to become a normal LIR, an extra limitation > could be that it would be required that you've some IPv4 PI space. This might be a valid option, but indeed not as something for this list but as something for the RIPE NCC GM. I do get the impression here that the current policy (Get a /32 or larger PA for providing access service to customers, or get a /48 PI as a multi homed end-user) is not 'wrong', but that people have problems with the cost of running an LIR. If this is the case I am not sure if we should start changing the policy... - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]