[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!

> From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Sander Steffann
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:24 PM
> Hi,
> 
> > So ... should we propose to remove the multihoming barrier ?
> >
> > What is the feeling of the list members ?
> 
> The last time we discussed this the feeling seemed to be that such a
> limitation was necessary to prevent an explosion of the IPv6 routing
> table. On the other hand we want people to start using IPv6. I am
> really curious what the rest of the list thinks about this.
> 
> - Sander

Hello Sander,

I would prefer to remove some limitations. The current option for someone
that has IPv4 PI space to get IPv6 PI space isn't easy enough if you ask me.
Making the transition as easy as possible (while keeping PA or PI space)
should be possible I think. Another option (but that isn't something for
this list I guess) is to have some LIR extra light account with just 1 IPv6
range and for more you need to become a normal LIR, an extra limitation
could be that it would be required that you've some IPv4 PI space.

Regards, Mark