[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!

I know ... very well :-)

I will let the customer, which is in the list to decide if they want to
provide details, I can't disclose them.

Regards,
Jordi






-----Mensaje original-----
De: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
Responder a: <gert at space.net>
Fecha: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:51:24 +0100
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!

>Hi,
>
>On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:50:39PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> requires PI, because the type of services they offer and they have
>
>Could you elaborate on this?  What type of *service* needs PI?
>
>In the discussions leading to the current PI policy, the consensus was
>"for BGP-style multihoming, an entry in the global routing table is
>inevitable, so PI won't make this better or worse" - so people agreed
>that this specific usage case warrants PI, and for everything else,
>they (well, *you* - this community!) wanted to see aggregateable
>addresses used...
>
>Gert Doering
>        -- APWG chair
>-- 
>did you enable IPv6 on something today...?
>
>SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
>Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.
>Grundner-Culemann
>D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.facebook.com/IPv6.now

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.