This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Feb 14 16:51:24 CET 2011
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:50:39PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> requires PI, because the type of services they offer and they have
Could you elaborate on this? What type of *service* needs PI?
In the discussions leading to the current PI policy, the consensus was
"for BGP-style multihoming, an entry in the global routing table is
inevitable, so PI won't make this better or worse" - so people agreed
that this specific usage case warrants PI, and for everything else,
they (well, *you* - this community!) wanted to see aggregateable
addresses used...
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]