This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
DI. Thomas Schallar
t.schallar at avalon.at
Fri Aug 26 09:20:53 CEST 2011
Hello!
I'm back with the same question I made a month ago: what ist the current
status on the multihomed v6 PI topic? The "current" phase on the
proposal ended three days ago (August 23rd) and the status is "Awaiting
Decision from Working Group Chair".
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-02
What now?
regards,
Thomas
DI. Thomas Schallar wrote 2011-07-27.07 01:41 pm:
> Hello!
>
> What ist the current status on the multihomed v6 PI topic?
>
> regards,
> Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]