This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Wed Aug 10 12:53:00 CEST 2011
Erik Bais wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > They can't get IPv6 PI for hosting business.. But would they to enable IPv6 for their own infrastructure ? If they wouldn't give addresses to other entities, they would still fit within the same rules as any other end-customer. yeap, and recently such cases were sent to "hell" with the reason "IPv6 PI is only available with direct agreement Customer-RIPE" Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]