[address-policy-wg] 2011-01 Review Period extended until 25 August 2011 (Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 mechanisms by the IANA)

Dear all,

There appears to be some confusion about in what capacity I send email to
the address policy mailing list.

While I thought this was obvious, all opinions, policy proposals, support
for proposals or lack thereof, mutterings and ramblings I state here are
my own and from a personal capacity, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

To prevent any further confusion, I'll try to include this in any future
postings - please forgive me the extra time you'll spend reading them.

As always, feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Remco


On 02-08-11 10:13, "Remco Van Mook" <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote:

>I support this proposal because there's an obvious need for it - what's
>not exactly clear to me however is if current IANA inventory (IIRC there
>was more there than just /8s) will be put into that same 'recovered' pool
>so no addresses get stuck (other than some scraps < /24).
>
>
>Remco van Mook
>Director of Interconnection, Europe
>
>remco.vanmook at eu.equinix.com
>+31 61 135 6365 MOB
>
>EQUINIX
>51-53 Great Marlborough Street
>London, W1F 7JT, United Kingdom
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 01-08-11 13:20, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> wrote:
>
>>Dear Working Group,
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:31:21PM +0200, Emilio Madaio wrote:
>>> The Review Period for the proposal 2011-01 has been extended until 25
>>> August 2011.
>>> 
>>> You can find the full proposal at:
>>> 
>>>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-01
>>
>>This proposal is doing another round of 4-week review phase because of
>>a distinct lack of feedback on it (one question, but no support /
>>objection
>>comments).
>>
>>There currently is a lack of policy at IANA/ICANN regarding distribution
>>of
>>"smaller than a /8" address blocks that happen to show up in the IANA
>>pool -
>>which means that even if such blocks should be found, IANA cannot
>>distribute
>>them to the RIRs.  Which those of you that still use IPv4 might then be
>>interested in receiving...
>>
>>This being a global policy, we don't do word smithing on it (the text
>>should
>>be the same in all regions), so your choice is easy: support, or
>>objection.
>>
>>Taking off the WG chair's hat, I think this is necessary housekeeping,
>>and
>>should be done -> *support*  (this implies that I don't get to decide
>>whether we have consensus on this one, but Sander will be the neutral WG
>>chair that oversees the process).
>>
>>Putting the hat back on, I welcome your comments!
>>
>>Gert Doering
>>        -- APWG chair
>>-- 
>>have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>>
>>SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
>>Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.
>>Grundner-Culemann
>>D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>>Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>>
>
>
>
>This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its
>associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted
>with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally
>privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
>have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
>this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited.  Registered Office:
>Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW.  Registered in
>England and Wales, No. 6293383.
>