This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-01 Review Period extended until 25 August 2011 (Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 mechanisms by the IANA)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-01 Review Period extended until 25 August 2011 (Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 mechanisms by the IANA)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-01 Review Period extended until 25 August 2011 (Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 mechanisms by the IANA)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remco Van Mook
Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com
Tue Aug 2 10:13:05 CEST 2011
I support this proposal because there's an obvious need for it - what's not exactly clear to me however is if current IANA inventory (IIRC there was more there than just /8s) will be put into that same 'recovered' pool so no addresses get stuck (other than some scraps < /24). Remco van Mook Director of Interconnection, Europe remco.vanmook at eu.equinix.com +31 61 135 6365 MOB EQUINIX 51-53 Great Marlborough Street London, W1F 7JT, United Kingdom On 01-08-11 13:20, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> wrote: >Dear Working Group, > >On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:31:21PM +0200, Emilio Madaio wrote: >> The Review Period for the proposal 2011-01 has been extended until 25 >> August 2011. >> >> You can find the full proposal at: >> >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-01 > >This proposal is doing another round of 4-week review phase because of >a distinct lack of feedback on it (one question, but no support / >objection >comments). > >There currently is a lack of policy at IANA/ICANN regarding distribution >of >"smaller than a /8" address blocks that happen to show up in the IANA >pool - >which means that even if such blocks should be found, IANA cannot >distribute >them to the RIRs. Which those of you that still use IPv4 might then be >interested in receiving... > >This being a global policy, we don't do word smithing on it (the text >should >be the same in all regions), so your choice is easy: support, or >objection. > >Taking off the WG chair's hat, I think this is necessary housekeeping, and >should be done -> *support* (this implies that I don't get to decide >whether we have consensus on this one, but Sander will be the neutral WG >chair that oversees the process). > >Putting the hat back on, I welcome your comments! > >Gert Doering > -- APWG chair >-- >have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > >SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard >Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. >Grundner-Culemann >D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) >Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-01 Review Period extended until 25 August 2011 (Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 mechanisms by the IANA)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-01 Review Period extended until 25 August 2011 (Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 mechanisms by the IANA)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]