This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Wed Apr 27 18:06:49 CEST 2011
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:36, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > (And towards Marcin: if these policies stop you from assigning /128 to > end customers, that was partly the intention. Customers are supposed to > receive at least a /64, or better a /56 or /48 - which is why LIRs can get > a huge block of addresses quite easily. Don't return into IPv4 > "single-address-plus-NAT" land!) This point can not be emphasized enough... _Please_ do no assign longer than a /64 to any customer, for any reason. And yes, I am talking about transfer prefixes, as well. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]