[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:10:15PM -0400, Martin Millnert wrote:
> Personally I'd much prefer if the policies were aligned with reality
> better, since it would allow us to get rid of the more or less
> arbitrary policy-interpreting role the IPRA:s at the RIPE NCC has for
> v6 resources today. This would make the landscape much more honest and
> just. After all, it's just bits anyway.

It's on our agenda for next week's APWG meeting, in the Thursday 11:00-12:30
time slot.

(And towards Marcin: if these policies stop you from assigning /128 to
end customers, that was partly the intention.  Customers are supposed to
receive at least a /64, or better a /56 or /48 - which is why LIRs can get
a huge block of addresses quite easily.  Don't return into IPv4
"single-address-plus-NAT" land!)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279