[address-policy-wg] Re: 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:02:59PM +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> Actually - it should become cheaper - effortwise - because the NCC can drop
> the superficial and ineffective "checks" made after assignment, to assess if
> the MH requirements were or still are met.

And it doesn't have to consider "need" regarding the amount of space
requested, if not more than /48. And even if more, the rules are far
simpler than with IPv4 where each and every address has to be justified.

So in fact, the cost for NCC to process+maintain IPv6 PI should be
(significantly?) less than with IPv4 PI.

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0