This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michiel Klaver
michiel at klaver.it
Fri Apr 15 13:04:07 CEST 2011
On 15-04-2011 12:01, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > If someone is willing to spend a substantial amount of money per year to > hold a PI, they have a real business need and are willing to back this with > cash because it's still cheaper for them. If they don't, then please stop > using DFZ resources for no real need. > Not everything on the internet is a bussiness with needs and a large bag of cash. Please also consider the non-profit organisations with valid reasons of running their own PI network. -- Michiel Klaver IT Professional
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]