This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Thu Nov 25 12:57:30 CET 2010
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:09, Rob Evans <rhe at nosc.ja.net> wrote: > Could we also then use GLOBAL-PDP-YYYY-NN to maintain a constant number > across all regions for global policy proposals? Or do I just need to learn > to remember which is which? "Global" is far from ideal, imo. It's not unique at all. rirs-pdp- ? > However, having to put all the changes for each RIR into a single document > will probably mean changes to the process in each region to cope with that, > and I'm very conscious that when we get to the point of spending too much > time fiddling with the process itself, it is time to look at what bits of it > we need at all. A rirs-pdp-1234 could simply reference the individual local working copy with backrefs from said copies to the global one. An alternative about which I am unsure myself would be ripe-global-pdp-1234-56, arin-global-pdp-1234-56 etc pp. Far from ideal, but as we are brainstorming... Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]