This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Thu Nov 25 12:09:41 CET 2010
Returning to the policy proposal numbering... Could we also then use GLOBAL-PDP-YYYY-NN to maintain a constant number across all regions for global policy proposals? Or do I just need to learn to remember which is which? The text would still have to be agreed by each region individually, but it might make tracking easier. However, having to put all the changes for each RIR into a single document will probably mean changes to the process in each region to cope with that, and I'm very conscious that when we get to the point of spending too much time fiddling with the process itself, it is time to look at what bits of it we need at all. Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]