[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals

Since policy proposals are transient and RIPE documents are permanent, I would strongly urge to stay away from any attempt to rename or renumber RIPE documents. RFCs don't get renamed or renumbered either, and for very good reason.

Remco

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-
> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Roesen
> Sent: woensdag 24 november 2010 11:57
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
> 
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:19:24AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > > PDP is redundant since your suggested prefix applies to policy proposals.
> >
> > To be fair, the prefix scheme might be adapted to other uses as well.
> > For example, it might make sense to use ripe-doc- for documents, at
> > some point.
> 
> That was indeed one of the reasons for my suggestion. Clearly separate
> namespace, adaptable to other documents/objects as well. I should probably
> have explained that explicitly.
> 
> Best regards,
> Daniel
> 
> --
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0



This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited.  Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW.  Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.