This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Nov 24 11:56:57 CET 2010
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:19:24AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > PDP is redundant since your suggested prefix applies to policy proposals. > > To be fair, the prefix scheme might be adapted to other uses as well. > For example, it might make sense to use ripe-doc- for documents, at > some point. That was indeed one of the reasons for my suggestion. Clearly separate namespace, adaptable to other documents/objects as well. I should probably have explained that explicitly. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]