[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 15:52, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:

> The only true soft-landing solution is to tie IPv6 deployment directly
> to IPv4 allocation. Organizations which are not deploying IPv6 along
> with IPv4 in their networks are not efficiently utilizing their IPv4
> addresses and should not be allowed to get more.

Quoth the proposal:

d) Allocations will only be made to LIRs if they have already received
an IPv6 allocation from an upstream LIR or the RIPE NCC.

Verifying actual deployment in an end-user-accessible form would
be a non-trivial task.


Richard

PS: Personally, I would not mind if no single IPv4 was made any
more without people requesting IPv6, as well. But there's not
enough time left to get that through and the problem will solve
itself, anyway.