[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 08:28, Richard Hartmann
<richih.mailinglist at gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
> There is not absolutely perfect solution. If you can improve upon the
> proposal, I am sure everyone would be excited to discuss your
> thoughts.

The only true soft-landing solution is to tie IPv6 deployment directly
to IPv4 allocation. Organizations which are not deploying IPv6 along
with IPv4 in their networks are not efficiently utilizing their IPv4
addresses and should not be allowed to get more.

~Chris

> In any case, I think there is a broad consensus that doing it this
> way is better than doing nothing.
>
>
> Richard
>
>





-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.coisoc.org