[address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space

Hello,

[de-lurk] Are split-location delegations any different / more evil than TE'd or distinct-routed subnets? I can't see where this is going.

Kind regards
Jamie Stallwood

--
Jamie Stallwood
Security Specialist
Imerja Limited
Tel: 07795 840385
jamie.stallwood at imerja.com



-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net on behalf of michael.dillon at bt.com
Sent: Wed 5/5/2010 15:00
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and 	IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
 
>  "Using addresses from a PI block to number other parties' devices is
>   permitted as long as these devices are connected to the 
> same network,
>   documentation about the usage can be presented to the RIPE NCC, and
>   full responsibility for the addresses (abuse handling etc) 
> is done by
>   the PI holder".


Such a long explanation!

Right now it says this:

  The PI assignment cannot be further assigned to other organisations.


How about changing it like this:

  The PI assignment cannot be further assigned to other organisations
unless their network infrastructure is wholly contained within the same
building as the applicant for a PI assignment.

If the word "wholly" seems to old-fashioned, replace it with
"completely".

Or you could say

   The PI assignment can be used for any devices connected to the
network on the PI applicant's premises such as a data centre, regardless
of who owns and controls those devices.

--Michael Dillon




-- 

Imerja Limited
Tel: 0870 8611488 | Fax: 0870 8611489 | 24x7 ISOC: 0870 8611490 | Web: www.imerja.com

Registered Office: Paragon House, Paragon Business Park, Chorley New Road, Horwich, Bolton BL6 6HG

Registered in England and Wales No. 5180119
VAT Registered No. 845 0647 22
ISO Registered Firm No. GB2001527

This email is confidential and intended solely for the person or 
organisation to which it is addressed. It may contain privileged and 
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s) you
should not use, copy, distribute or take any action or reliance on it,
since to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this transmission in error please notify the sender 
immediately by email reply and delete it from your system. E-mail 
messages are not secure and attachments could contain software viruses
which may damage your system. Whilst every reasonable precaution has
been taken to minimise this risk, Imerja Limited cannot accept any
liability for any damage sustained as a result of these factors. You
are advised to carry out your own virus checks before opening any
attachment. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely
those of the author and do not represent those of Imerja Limited 
unless otherwise stated.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20100505/2fe5e76e/attachment.html>