[address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space

>  "Using addresses from a PI block to number other parties' devices is
>   permitted as long as these devices are connected to the 
> same network,
>   documentation about the usage can be presented to the RIPE NCC, and
>   full responsibility for the addresses (abuse handling etc) 
> is done by
>   the PI holder".


Such a long explanation!

Right now it says this:

  The PI assignment cannot be further assigned to other organisations.


How about changing it like this:

  The PI assignment cannot be further assigned to other organisations
unless their network infrastructure is wholly contained within the same
building as the applicant for a PI assignment.

If the word "wholly" seems to old-fashioned, replace it with
"completely".

Or you could say

   The PI assignment can be used for any devices connected to the
network on the PI applicant's premises such as a data centre, regardless
of who owns and controls those devices.

--Michael Dillon