[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)

Hi Max,

The proposal has *never* been about PI, ever. Alain and I were requested
to include specific wording to that effect. So we did. :-)

Best wishes,

philip
--

Max Tulyev said the following on 7/07/10 20:36 :
> Hi All,
> 
> I see the policy proposal now deny PI at all. Why?
> 
> Those who requsted PI (through us) usually are not so big to become a
> LIR and request /20. They even don't need it. By this proposal, you will
> stimulate small companies become a LIR and get /22 instead of for
> example /24 PI.
> 
> For my point of view, there should not be a difference between PA and PI
> distribution in the policy. Better is to make some actions to allow
> de-aggregate prefixes to more than /24. Then those who need /29 will ask
> for /29, not for /24 PI (now) or even /22 PA (if 2010-02 will be in power).
> 
> Emilio Madaio написав(ла):
>> PDP Number: 2010-02
>> Allocations from the last /8
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> The text of the policy proposal 2010-02 has been revised based on the
>> community feedback received on the mailing list.
>>
>> The draft policy document and the impact analysis for the proposal
>> have also been published.
>>
>>
>> You can find the full proposal at:
>>
>>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html
>>     and the draft document at:
>>
>>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-492-draft2010-02.html
>>
>> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments
>> to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 4 August.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Emilio Madaio
>> Policy Development Officer
>> RIPE NCC
>>
>>
> 
>