This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Fri Dec 17 00:05:03 CET 2010
> I think you are correct. 'Published' is also much easier to verify > for the IPRA's than 'clear'. Unfortunately the webcasts are not > available online yet, but IIRC there was agreement to use > 'published'. Does anybody remember differently? We were in danger of wordsmithing with a few hundred people in the room, but it tended towards "published" at the end. http://ripe61.ripe.net/archives/steno/2/ A search for "Blessing" takes you towards the conclusion of the discussion... :) Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]